LAUSR

OBJECTIVES Pedicle screw testing is a widely used technique in the field of neuromonitoring for spinal surgery. It was designed by Calancie et al. (1992) in order to detect pedicle breach, one of the major complications of pedicle screw fixation, which can lead to neurological impairment. However, numerous false negative and equivocal results led to its clinical relevance being questioned. We aimed to clarify these discrepancies and characterize electrical parameters underlying this technique. METHODS In this setting, our study is divided into two parts: (1) a clinical part assessing the difference between direct pedicle hole via the pedicle perforator stimulation and indirect stimulation via the implanted screw; (2) an in vitro study testing the electrical properties (resistivity and conductivity) on a sample of different commonly used pedicle screws. RESULTS We showed that there were discrepancies between direct perforator stimulation and pedicle screws, especially at high threshold values. These might be attributed to electrical contact discontinuity. In vitro testing revealed that the previously described resistivity variability and the instability of measures are due to the result of slight changes of position of the recording contacts. CONCLUSION Electrical continuity is crucial in the pedicle screw test technique. This parameter cannot actually be fully ensured and can lead to discrepancies and potentially false negative results. Therefore, we recommend the use of both direct stimulation of the pedicle hole and control testing of the screw. Further studies and improvement of the technique are required to ensure its reliability.