LAUSR

&NA; The ability to track the relationality of concepts, i.e., their capacity to encode a relationship between entities, is one of the core semantic abilities humans possess. In language processing, we systematically leverage this ability when computing verbal argument structure, in order to link participants to the events they participate in. Previous work has converged on a large region of left posterior perisylvian cortex as a locus for such processing, but the wide range of experimental stimuli and manipulations has yielded an unclear picture of the region's exact role(s). Importantly, there is a tendency for effects of relationality in single‐word studies to localize to posterior temporo‐parietal cortex, while argument structure effects in sentences appear in left superior temporal cortex. To characterize these sensitivities, we designed two MEG experiments that cross the factors relationality and eventivity. The first used minimal noun phrases and tested for an effect of semantic composition, while the second employed full sentences and a manipulation of grammatical category. The former identified a region of the left inferior parietal lobe sensitive to relationality, but not eventivity or combination, beginning at 170 ms. The latter revealed a similarly‐timed effect of relationality in left mid‐superior temporal cortex, independent of eventivity and category. The results suggest that i) multiple sub‐regions of perisylvian cortex are sensitive to the relationality carried by concepts even in the absence of arguments, ii) linguistic context modulates the locus of this sensitivity, consistent with prior studies, and iii) relationality information is accessed early – before 200 ms – regardless of the concept's event status or syntactic category. HighlightsThe processing of relational concepts was investigated with MEG.Left perisylvian regions were sensitive to relationality prior to 200 ms.These effects did not depend on eventivity, combinatory context or syntactic category.Localization of relationality effects differed between minimal phrases and sentences.