LAUSR

ABSTRACT Faces of one's own‐age group are easier to recognize than other‐age faces. Using behavioral measures and EEG, we studied whether an own‐age bias (OAB) also exists in voice memory. Young (19 ‐ 26 years) and old (60–75 years) participants studied young (18–25 years) and old (60–77 years) unfamiliar voices from short sentences. Subsequently, they classified studied and novel voices as “old” (i.e. studied) or “new”, from the same sentences. Recognition performance was higher in young compared to old participants, and for old compared to young voices, with no OAB. At the same time, we found evidence for higher distinctiveness of old compared to young voices, both in terms of acoustic measures and subjective ratings (independent of rater age). Analyses of event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) indicated more negative‐going deflections (400–1000 ms) for old compared to young voices in young participants. In old participants, we observed a reversed OLD/NEW memory effect, with overall more positive amplitudes for novel compared to studied old (but not young) voices (400–1000 ms). Time‐frequency analyses revealed less beta power (16–26 Hz) for young compared to old voices at left anterior sites, and also reduced beta power for correctly recognized studied (compared to novel) voices at left posterior sites (300–900 ms). These findings could suggest an engagement of cortical areas during stimulus‐specific recollection from about 300 ms, in a task that emphasized the analysis of individual acoustic features. HighlightsWe found better recognition of old vs. young voices in both old and young adults.These effects may relate to increased distinctiveness of old voices.We found no own‐age bias in voice recognition.Recognized vs. novel voices elicited suppressed EEG beta band power.These effects reflect stimulus‐specific voice recollection from about 300 ms.