LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Renormalization-group evolution of the none-local matrix element of B-meson in QCD and B → π transition form factor

Photo from wikipedia

We consider the renormalization-group evolution of the matrix element of 〈0|q̄(z)β[z, 0]b(0)α|B̄〉, which can be used to define the distribution amplitudes for B meson and widely applied in studies of… Click to show full abstract

We consider the renormalization-group evolution of the matrix element of 〈0|q̄(z)β[z, 0]b(0)α|B̄〉, which can be used to define the distribution amplitudes for B meson and widely applied in studies of B meson decays. The contribution to the renormalization constant of the non-local operator q̄(z)β[z, 0]b(0)α is considered up to one-loop order in QCD. Since the quark fields in this operator are not directly coupled fields, momentum can not flow freely through this non-local operator. Momentum involved in this operator can be treated stringently in coordinate space. We find that the ultraviolet divergences regulated by dimensional parameter ǫ cancel with each other, and the evolution effect vanishes. The matrix element 〈0|q̄(z)β[z, 0]b(0)α|B̄〉 escapes from the renormalization-group evolution. We then apply the matrix element in calculating B → π transition form factor, where the matrix element is obtained by using the B meson wave function calculated in QCD-inspired potential model. By comparing with experimental data for the semileptonic decay of B → πlν and light-cone sum rule calculation, we analyse the perturbative and non-perturbative contributions to B → π transition form factor in the frame work of perturbative QCD approach. We find that the effectiveness of the suppression of Sudakov factor to soft contribution depends on the end-point behavior of B meson wave function, and with the B-meson wave function used in this work, soft contribution can not be well suppressed. The hard contribution to the B → π transition form factor is about 59%, and soft contribution can be as large as 41% in the naive calculation. To make the perturbative calculation reliable, a soft momentum cutoff in the calculation and soft form factor have to be introduced.

Keywords: form factor; renormalization; transition form; factor; matrix element

Journal Title: Nuclear Physics B
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.