LAUSR

OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to compare radiation absorbed dose (AD) and effective dose (ED) to tissues from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans with 360-degree versus 180-degree rotations with use of different fields of view (FOV), to compare EDs calculated from measured ADs versus dose area product (DAP) values, and to compare doses to the lens of the eye (LOE) from different scan parameters. STUDY DESIGN ADs for each protocol were measured in tissues, including the LOE, by using an anthropometric phantom. EDs were calculated on the basis of dosimetry (EDm) and DAP values (EDd). Dose differences were determined with analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS ADs and EDs were substantially lower for 180-degree rotation scans compared with 360-degree rotation scans (P < .01). Remainder tissues had the greatest effect on effective dose for most FOVs. Doses were generally lower with small FOVs compared with large FOVs. Most EDm values were lower than EDd values in large FOVs but higher in small FOVs. Differences in EDm and EDd were variable and unpredictable. LOE doses were smaller with the 180-degree scans and smaller FOVs. CONCLUSIONS Radiation doses were generally lower with 180-degree rotation scans and smaller FOVs. These parameters should be used for CBCT acquisitions, whenever possible, and should be made available in all units.