LAUSR

Background Clinicohistopathologic assessment of patients with ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma remains the best diagnostic modality for the tumors. However, in cases where the criteria for arriving at a definitive diagnosis are not clearcut, the pathologist is faced with a dilemma and thus an imperative need for adjunct diagnostic methods. Objectives 1. To evaluate/compare the immunohistochemical expression of NM23 in classical, borderline (atypical) ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. 2. To assess usefulness of NM23 in closing diagnostic gaps between ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. Methods Twenty-four cases of ameloblastoma (10 ameloblastoma with classical histopathologic features, 8 with nonclassical histopathology [atypical], and 6 cases of ameloblastic carcinoma) were selected from cases seen at the Oral Pathology Laboratory of the Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria. NM23 immunostaining protocol was done on the selected tissue blocks and evaluated using the Sinicrope method. Analysis was done using STATA 14. Results Positive NM23 staining was observed in all cases of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma, with more intense staining observed in the stellate reticulum-like areas than in the ameloblast-like areas. Ameloblastic carcinoma stained intensely with NM23 (100%) compared with atypical cases (37.5%) and ameloblastoma (20.0%; P = .04). The mean aggregate score was also significantly higher in AC (11 ± 2.4; P = .01). The mean aggregate score was also significant amongst growth pattern of ameloblastoma (P = .02). Conclusions The findings in this study reveal the usefulness of NM23 in differentiating ameloblastoma from ameloblastic carcinoma; a more comprehensive study with a larger sample size is recommended to corroborate or refute the findings in this study.