LAUSR

Abstract Sedimentary δDn-alkane values have been widely used as a valuable proxy for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. A number of studies have focused on δDn-alkane values that derived exclusively from leaves, while less attention has been paid to the root-derived n-alkanes and their impact on sedimentary δDn-alkane values. In this study, we sampled modern plant leaf and root materials from different growth contexts (slopes and seasons) on the Chinese Loess Plateau to compare leaf-derived n-alkanes with root-derived n-alkanes. Our results demonstrated that total n-alkane (C27–C33) concentrations varied substantially between leaf and root materials, with average values of 209  and 29.5 μg/g observed in leaves and roots respectively. The results suggest that ca. 12% of the n-alkane concentrations in sediments may be derived from plant roots. Furthermore, leaf-derived δDn-alkane values for Stipa bungeana (grass), Artemisisa vestita (shrub) and Bothriochloa ischaemum (grass) averaged −184‰, −152‰ and −198‰, compared with their root-derived δDn-alkane values of −199‰, −179‰ and −163‰, respectively. These statistically significant differences in concentrations and δD values between leaf-derived and root-derived n-alkanes suggest that the contribution of n-alkanes derived from plant roots is important for evaluating the resultant n-alkane compositions of sediments for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Our findings indicates that the effects of root-derived n-alkanes on total sedimentary δDn-alkane values should be considered carefully in future paleoenvironmental reconstruction efforts.