LAUSR

INTRODUCTION Interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) is a clinical procedure that has been in use since the advent of non-extraction orthodontic techniques. However, such a procedure affects the surface condition of the enamel and may predispose patients to cavities and hypersensitivity. The use of a remineralizing agent is recommended to prevent these side effects. The objective of our study was to evaluate the evolution of stripped proximal dental surfaces after exposure to the oral environment for 4 months with and without fluoride protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our sample consisted of 14 premolars (PM) from 6 patients of the Dentofacial Orthopaedics Department of the Consultation and Dental Treatment Centre of Rabat (CDTC) who required orthodontic treatment with PM extraction and had given their informed consent. The teeth were divided into 5 groups: group 1: intact enamel; group 2: intact enamel+fluoride varnish+4-month oral exposure; group 3: IPR (manual and mechanized)+extraction; group 4: IPR (manual and mechanized) without varnish+4-month oral exposure; group 5: IPR (manual and mechanized)+fluoride varnish+4-month oral exposure. Proximal surfaces were subjected to qualitative analysis by scanning electron microscopy and quantitative analysis by Dispersive Energy Spectroscopy (DES) to quantify the percentage of mineral elements. RESULTS Exposure of stripped dental surfaces to the oral environment for 4 months with or without fluoride protection showed the persistence of surface irregularities caused by stripping. We noted an improvement in the percentage of mineral elements for both groups with and without fluoride protection. However, the percentages of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were close to that of intact enamel in the fluoride varnish group. CONCLUSION Protecting stripped surfaces with fluoride varnish could help preserve the integrity of the enamel surface by restoring some of the mineral elements lost during stripping.