Abstract Purpose This study aimed to identify the differences in interventional effects on hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among families and visitors in pediatric wards. Design & methods A total of… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to identify the differences in interventional effects on hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among families and visitors in pediatric wards. Design & methods A total of 2787 family and non-family visitors entering through the glass sliding door of 6 pediatric wards at a university children's hospital were observed for 4 h, respectively, before and after interventions between April 27 and May 20, 2018. In the first intervention, a visual stimulus emphasized the location of the hand sanitizer. In the second intervention, an additional auditory stimulus transmitted a cue through a motion sensor speaker. Results During the preliminary observation, the HHC rates of family and non-family visitors were 0.0% and 1.5%, respectively; after the visual stimulus, they were 0.6% and 5.4%, and after the audio-visual stimulus, 1.8% and 8.2%. There was a significant increase in the overall HHC with the visual (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 1.76–20.90) and audio-visual (OR, 8.67; 95% CI, 3.08–33.70) stimuli (Fisher's exact test, p < .05). Conclusions The HHC of family and non-family visitors entering pediatric wards was very low and the audio-visual stimulus was found to be more effective than was the visual stimulus alone. Practice implications To reduce healthcare-associated infection, pediatric wards must actively implement effective interventions. Using audio-visual stimulation to increase HHC among visitors will provide advantages. Follow-up research should examine the current state of HHC among visitors in various locations and conditions.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.