LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The minimum basic dataset for diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease: Methodological issue on reliability.

Photo from archive.org

Reliability (precision, repeatability, agreement) and validity (accuracy) are two completely different issues which should be assessed using appropriate tests. It is crucial to know that, reporting concordance rate; the selection… Click to show full abstract

Reliability (precision, repeatability, agreement) and validity (accuracy) are two completely different issues which should be assessed using appropriate tests. It is crucial to know that, reporting concordance rate; the selection error rate and the classification error rate are not the most appropriate estimates to assess reliability. Regarding reliability, for qualitative variables, weighted kappa should be used with caution. However, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratio positive and negative as well as diagnostic accuracy are estimates that are usually used to evaluate the validity of a test compared to a gold standard.

Keywords: basic dataset; diagnoses cerebrovascular; minimum basic; dataset diagnoses; cerebrovascular disease; reliability

Journal Title: Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.