LAUSR

Background Laboratories performing clinical high-throughput sequencing for oncology and germline testing are increasingly migrating their data storage to cloud-based solutions. Cloud-based storage has several advantages, such as low per-GB prices, scalability, and minimal fixed costs; however, while these solutions tout ostensibly simple usage-based pricing plans, practical cost analysis of cloud storage for NGS data storage is not straightforward. Methods We developed an easy-to-use tool designed specifically for cost and usage estimation for laboratories performing clinical NGS testing (https://ngscosts.info). Our tool enables quick exploration of dozens of storage options across three major cloud providers, and provides complex cost and usage forecasts over 1–20 year timeframes. Parameters include current test volumes, growth rate, data compression, data retention policies, and case re-access rates. Outputs include an easy-to-visualize chart of total data stored, yearly and lifetime costs, and a “cost per test” estimate. Results Two factors were found to markedly decrease the average cost per test: 1) reducing total file size, including through the use of compression, 2) rapid transfer to “cold” or archival storage. In contrast, re-access of data from archival storage tiers was not found to dramatically increase the cost of storage per test. Conclusions Steady declines in cloud storage pricing, as well as new options for storage and retrieval, make storing clinical NGS data on the cloud economical and friendly to laboratory workflows. Our web-based tool makes it possible to explore and compare cloud storage solutions and provide forecasts specifically for clinical NGS laboratories.