Photo from archive.org
Abstract Here, we respond to the comments of Y. Kuzmin on the conclusions of our investigations at the multi-layered Ushki V site, central Kamchatka, published in the paper of I.… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Here, we respond to the comments of Y. Kuzmin on the conclusions of our investigations at the multi-layered Ushki V site, central Kamchatka, published in the paper of I. Yu. Ponkratova and others (QSR, 2021). The critical opinion of the site chronology as well as the final Pleistocene-Holocene cultural sequence classification and the provenience of the most ancient pottery on the peninsula we find unsubstantiated and provide the supporting arguments.
Keywords:
reply comments;
quaternary science;
comments chronology;
chronology environmental;
science reviews
Journal Title: Quaternary Science Reviews
Year Published: 2021
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Quaternary Science Reviews
Year Published: 2021
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!