LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Response to ECG, May 2019.

Photo from wikipedia

In ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the observed ST elevation can due to obstruction of the left anterior descending artery, but such findings would usually be accompanied by ST elevation in the… Click to show full abstract

In ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the observed ST elevation can due to obstruction of the left anterior descending artery, but such findings would usually be accompanied by ST elevation in the aVR lead and ST depression in the inferior leads (and so response 1 is incorrect). Isolated right ventricular (RV) infarction usually shows more marked ST elevation in leads V1-V2 and a tendency for ST elevation in the inferior leads (response 2 incorrect). Although the S1Q3T3 pattern is present, T wave inversions are the precordial electrocardiographic abnormalities usually observed in pulmonary thromboembolism with RV involvement while ST elevation is not usually present in these leads. If observed, it would be similar to RV infarction (response 3 incorrect). The correct response is 4, given that ST elevation is more evident in leads V3-V4, which could only be explained by a mass that infiltrates the midapical wall of the RV (Figure).

Keywords: response ecg; response; may 2019; response incorrect; elevation; ecg may

Journal Title: Revista espanola de cardiologia
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.