LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Post-fall syndrome: Profile and outcomes

Photo from wikipedia

Objective Post-fall syndrome (PFS) is a severe complication of falls in older adults. PFS is considered to be a medical emergency in geriatric patients, given the risk of a decompensatory… Click to show full abstract

Objective Post-fall syndrome (PFS) is a severe complication of falls in older adults. PFS is considered to be a medical emergency in geriatric patients, given the risk of a decompensatory “domino effect” and mortality. Unfortunately, there is currently no consensus on how to detect patients at risk of PFS. The primary objective of the present study was to profile patients suffering from PFS. The secondary objective was to study the prognosis of patients with PFS after their discharge from an aftercare and rehabilitation department (ARD). Material/Patients and methods We prospectively surveyed patients hospitalized in the geriatric ARD at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France) after a fall. Cases (i.e. patients meeting the criteria for PFS: the simultaneous presence of a postural disorder, a gait disorder and a psychobehavioural disorder) were compared with controls (i.e. patients free of PFS). Results Seventy-two patients were included (females: 74%). The median [interquartile range] age was 85.5 [81; 90]. Thirty-four patients (47%) had PFS. The symptoms most frequent significantly associated with PFS were retropulsion in stance, and anxiety about movement. Cases and controls did not differ significantly with regard to other signs (little step walking, axial akinesia, oppositional hypertonia, etc.). Patients with PFS were more likely to present with vascular dementia (P = 0.0166) and osteoporosis (P = 0.0458), and were less likely to be taking drugs associated with falls (P = 0.0003). Initial functional assessments (according to both the Mini Motor Test and the Timed Up-and-Go test) showed that functional abilities were more severely impaired in the patients suffering from PFS. Nevertheless, the same functional assessment on discharge did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups. Likewise, there were no intergroup differences in mortality or institutionalization on discharge from the ARD. Discussion/Conclusion The imperative development of a precise, consensual definition of PFS is now justified by the gravity of this syndrome and the potential for functional recovery. Continuation of this ongoing study may highlight prognostic factors associated with the status of patients with PFS 6 months after discharge from the ARD.

Keywords: syndrome profile; fall syndrome; patients pfs; post fall

Journal Title: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.