BACKGROUND Prognostic tools for decision-making whether to continue advanced life support or limit life sustaining interventions in In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA), remain scarce and inconclusive. In this regard it seems… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic tools for decision-making whether to continue advanced life support or limit life sustaining interventions in In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA), remain scarce and inconclusive. In this regard it seems intuitive that the presence of aortic stenosis (AS) impacts on both central and peripheral perfusion during resuscitative attempts and might worsen outcome. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of AS on outcome after IHCA. METHODS Out of 11,641 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, a total of 151 patients were identified that received a standardized echocardiographic diagnostic immediately prior to an IHCA. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to elucidate the prognostic impact of AS on outcome. RESULTS Within the entire study population, a total of 51 individuals with AS (mild: n = 19 [12.5%]; moderate: n = 11 [7.2%]; severe: n = 21 [13.8%]) were identified. We observed that 81% of patients with severe AS did not survive until hospital discharge. Additionally, the presence of AS showed a strong and independent inverse association with return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 0.10 [95%CI:0.03-0.36], p < 0.001), survival (adj. OR of 0.14 [95%CI: 0.04-0.48]; p = 0.002) and favourable neurological outcome (OR of 0.16 [95%CI: 0.06-0.49]; p = 0.001). The observed prognostic impact remained stable irrespective of AS severity. CONCLUSION AS proved to be a strong and independent predictor for mortality and poor outcome after IHCA. Therefore, the presence of AS mirrors an easily available predictive tool for risk stratification and decision-making.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.