Abstract Computational QSPR and MD simulation methods were used to design and assess new anti-friction lubricant additives. Four new additives were designed and butyl2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylthio)-2-hydroxy acetate anti-friction additive was found to… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Computational QSPR and MD simulation methods were used to design and assess new anti-friction lubricant additives. Four new additives were designed and butyl2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylthio)-2-hydroxy acetate anti-friction additive was found to be excellently better than other co-additives and also better than the one reported by other researchers. MD simulation's investigation also proved that butyl2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylthio)-2-hydroxy acetate also has better and more promised dynamic binding energy (−20.509 kcal/mol) than other newly designed additives. Therefore, QSPR and MD simulation's investigation tools show that 2-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylthio)-2-hydroxy acetate was a more excellent anti-friction additive since it has a better anti-friction property and dynamic binding energy than other designed additives. These two methods could be used to design better and more promising anti-friction properties before laboratory synthesis and characterization since they have been proven to be good research tools due to their good correlation ability.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.