LAUSR

STUDY OBJECTIVE In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone for the treatment of primary insomnia. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed from inception to June 2018. Additionally, we searched the ClinicalTrials.gov trials register for other relevant trials. According to participants, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) criteria, studies were included that focused on: adults diagnosed with primary insomnia, aged 18-65 and > 65 years; eszopiclone for the treatment of primary insomnia; comparison were made between eszopiclone and placebo; as well as primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, and adverse effects. RESULTS A total of six randomized trials involving 2809 patients with primary insomnia were included in our analysis. Our analysis suggested that eszopiclone was associated with significant improvements in subjective sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings, total sleep time at one week, two weeks, one month, three months and six months. Meanwhile, eszopiclone was associated with increased quality of sleep, ability to function, daytime alertness and sense of physical well-being at one week, one month, three months and six months. Dizziness and unpleasant taste were the most common adverse effects in elderly subgroup. Alternately, non-elderly patients may be more prone to adverse effects such as infection, pharyngitis, somnolence, unpleasant taste and dry mouth. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that eszopiclone is an effective and safe therapy option for patients with primary insomnia, especially in elderly patients. However, due to the high clinical heterogeneity in some outcomes, further standardized preparation, large-scale and rigorously designed trials are needed.