LAUSR

OBJECTIVES Routine omentectomy is generally not performed in patients with endometrial cancer unless there is evidence of gross omental metastases. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of omentectomy in the staging of clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma and its impact on overall survival. METHODS Patients in the National Cancer Database who presented between 2010 and 2015 with clinical stage I serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma and underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy were selected. Patients who did and did not receive an omentectomy were identified and clinico-pathological characteristics were compared. Overall survival was evaluated for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 who had at least one month of follow-up following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and comparison with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS A total of 9097 patients were identified, and 36.3% underwent an omentectomy. Patients who underwent omentectomy were more likely to be managed in academic institutions (50% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have an open surgery (48.2% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.001) and receive adjuvant chemotherapy (54.7% vs. 38.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo omentectomy, p = 0.61; the 3-year OS rates were 82.3% and 82.2%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, the performance of an omentectomy was not associated with better survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.84, 1.05). CONCLUSIONS Routine omentectomy may not be associated with a survival benefit for patients with clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma.