LAUSR

Calibration transfer or standardisation aims at creating a uniform spectral response on different spectroscopic instruments or under varying conditions, without requiring a full recalibration for each situation. In the current study, this strategy is applied to construct at-line multivariate calibration models and consequently employ them in-line in a continuous industrial production line, using the same spectrometer. Firstly, quantitative multivariate models are constructed at-line at laboratory scale for predicting the concentration of two main ingredients in hard surface cleaners. By regressing the Raman spectra of a set of small-scale calibration samples against their reference concentration values, partial least squares (PLS) models are developed to quantify the surfactant levels in the liquid detergent compositions under investigation. After evaluating the models performance with a set of independent validation samples, a univariate slope/bias correction is applied in view of transporting these at-line calibration models to an in-line manufacturing set-up. This standardisation technique allows a fast and easy transfer of the PLS regression models, by simply correcting the model predictions on the in-line set-up, without adjusting anything to the original multivariate calibration models. An extensive statistical analysis is performed in order to assess the predictive quality of the transferred regression models. Before and after transfer, the R2 and RMSEP of both models is compared for evaluating if their magnitude is similar. T-tests are then performed to investigate whether the slope and intercept of the transferred regression line are not statistically different from 1 and 0, respectively. Furthermore, it is inspected whether no significant bias can be noted. F-tests are executed as well, for assessing the linearity of the transfer regression line and for investigating the statistical coincidence of the transfer and validation regression line. Finally, a paired t-test is performed to compare the original at-line model to the slope/bias corrected in-line model, using interval hypotheses. It is shown that the calibration models of Surfactant 1 and Surfactant 2 yield satisfactory in-line predictions after slope/bias correction. While Surfactant 1 passes seven out of eight statistical tests, the recommended validation parameters are 100% successful for Surfactant 2. It is hence concluded that the proposed strategy for transferring at-line calibration models to an in-line industrial environment via a univariate slope/bias correction of the predicted values offers a successful standardisation approach.