LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Submentalizing Cannot Explain Belief-Based Action Anticipation in Apes

Photo by sxy_selia from unsplash

We presented apes with a nonsocial control of our previously published study [11] using identical methods except that, following [6] (Figure I), stimuli were animated versions in which the human… Click to show full abstract

We presented apes with a nonsocial control of our previously published study [11] using identical methods except that, following [6] (Figure I), stimuli were animated versions in which the human actor was swapped out for a green semicircle and the King Kong antagonist for a grey triangle. The submentalizing hypothesis predicts that, given similar attention, retrieval and contextual cueing will elicit similar anticipatory looking patterns. In the control test, apes closely tracked all key events. However, unlike in the original study, only half of the apes looked to the boxes upon the return of the green semicircle. Moreover, unlike in the original study, among those apes that did make looks to the boxes, there was no significant tendency to look first (or longer) to the correct over the incorrect box, with a notably smaller effect size. Thus, the results from the control study do not support the submentalizing hypothesis.

Keywords: action anticipation; belief based; submentalizing explain; anticipation apes; explain belief; based action

Journal Title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.