The authors regret to inform that there are some errors in the presentation of the results of the article referenced above In Table 1, some decimal numbers are separated by… Click to show full abstract
The authors regret to inform that there are some errors in the presentation of the results of the article referenced above In Table 1, some decimal numbers are separated by a comma (“,”), while others are presented without a decimal separator, when in reality all results should be separated by a point (“ ”) Hence the Table 1 should be changed as follows: The values of the “X” - “Y” axes in Fig 2 and the numerical scale in Fig 3 are separated by a comma (“,”), but must be separated by a point (“ ”) as follows: [Figure presented] Fig 2 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of fruits and vegetables marketed in the first quarter of 2020 in the different Ceasas studied A: Principal Component Analysis of factor 1 vs factor 2 B: Principal Component Analysis of factor 1 vs factor 3 Ceasa-RJ: Ceasa Rio de Janeiro;Ceasa-RS: Ceasa Rio Grande do Sul;Ceasa-GO: Ceasa Goias;Ceasa-PE: Ceasa Pernambuco The numbers “1”, “2” and “3” represent the months of January, February and March, respectively [Figure presented] Fig 3 Cluster analysis of the different Ceasas studied based on the commercialization of fruits and vegetables in the first quarter of 2020 Ceasa-RJ: Ceasa Rio de Janeiro;Ceasa-RS: Ceasa Rio Grande do Sul;Ceasa-GO: Ceasa Goias;Ceasa-PE: Ceasa Pernambuco The numbers “1”, “2” and “3” represent the months of January, February and March, respectively The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.