Interpreting in vitro bioassays used to determine resistance against acaricides in Rhipicephalus microplus can be challenging without parallel in vivo studies that assess for lost efficacy. The larval immersion test… Click to show full abstract
Interpreting in vitro bioassays used to determine resistance against acaricides in Rhipicephalus microplus can be challenging without parallel in vivo studies that assess for lost efficacy. The larval immersion test (LIT) is currently the most widely used bioassay to detect ivermectin resistance. The objective of this study was to compare results of the LIT and a field trial using ivermectin in naturally infested cattle. Criteria to consider ticks as resistant with the LIT were based on discriminating doses (DD) and the ratio of lethal concentration (LC) in test populations over the LC of the susceptible Deutch strain, known as the resistance ratio (RR). Ticks were collected from 4 farms, two where ivermectin provided good control of tick infestations and two that claimed lack of efficacy. In two farms where administration of a long-acting ivermectin formulation reduced body tick counts to 45 and 25% of the initial counts at 10-days post-treatment, the RR50 and RR99 were approximately 6 and 20, respectively. The LC50 value approximated the DD for the two farms with claimed resistance, suggesting that about half of the population in each farm was resistant. These LIT values are equal to those reported for the most resistant ticks, which supports the use of the LIT to predict control failure in field situations. The two farms where ivermectin provided good control of tick infestations had LC50s similar to the susceptible strain, although for one farm the LC99 and RR99 suggested incipient resistance.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.