LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

High-throughput, semi-automated quantitative STEM mass measurement of supported metal nanoparticles using a conventional TEM/STEM.

Photo from wikipedia

The adaptation of quantitative STEM techniques to enable atom-counting in supported metal nanoparticles with a modern, conventional (non-aberration-corrected) TEM/STEM (a JEOL JEM2100F) without the need for any modifications or special… Click to show full abstract

The adaptation of quantitative STEM techniques to enable atom-counting in supported metal nanoparticles with a modern, conventional (non-aberration-corrected) TEM/STEM (a JEOL JEM2100F) without the need for any modifications or special hardware is presented. No image simulation is required, either. This technique enables the practical analysis of the size, mass, and basic shape information of statistically robust populations of hundreds to thousands of nanoparticles. The methods for performing the necessary calibrations of the microscope and images are detailed. A user-friendly semi-automated analysis program was also written to facilitate high throughput. The program optimizes the analysis parameters, applying the procedure consistently across the entire dataset, enhancing the meaningfulness of the statistics as well as the reproducibility and transferability of the results. A series of atomically precise Au nanoparticles were used to validate the technique, which was determined to be accurate within a (nearly uniform) scaling factor of around two for the given instrument, and could be brought into better agreement with a calibration standard. The magnitude of the disparity was found to significantly and unexpectedly rely on the chosen magnification and spot size, the underlying reasons for which are unclear and likely instrument-dependent. The possible sources of error from the calibration and acquisition were examined and their impact on the accuracy and precision of quantification were estimated. The scattering cross-sections measured using this technique are relatively insensitive to moderate errors in the various detector calibrations but particularly sensitive to pixel size error.

Keywords: supported metal; metal nanoparticles; tem stem; quantitative stem; semi automated; stem

Journal Title: Ultramicroscopy
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.