LAUSR

OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy of navigation-guided minimally invasive surgery in patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. METHODS A total of 64 patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were divided into a navigation group and a traditional group based on surgical approaches. The data for the 2 groups of patients were analyzed with regard for the hematoma clearance rate, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, Barthel index score at 6 months, and postoperative complication rates for rebleeding and pneumonia. RESULTS There were no significant differences in basic characteristics between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The hematoma clearance rate was significantly lower in the navigation group (49.18 ± 16.76%) than in the traditional group (84.29 ± 6.91%, P < 0.01). The duration of surgery and duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter in the navigation group (55.00 ± 11.89 minutes and 24.25 ± 7.1 days, respectively) than in the traditional group (156.38 ± 47.9 minutes and 32.63 ± 9.8 days, respectively; both P < 0.01). There were also significant differences between the 2 groups in Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (P = 0.006). The Barthel index scores were significantly greater in the navigation group (73.13 ± 18.76) than in the traditional group (57.63 ± 26.63, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the complication rates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Under certain conditions, compared with standard craniotomy and hematoma evacuation, navigation-guided hematoma puncture aspiration and catheter drainage is simple, effective, and safe as a treatment for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage.