LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Correlation Between Different Interbody Grafts and Pseudarthrosis after ACDF Compared to Control Group: Systematic Review.

Photo from wikipedia

Background Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy.… Click to show full abstract

Background Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is important to study pseudarthrosis rates after ACDF and correlate them with the graft used. Methods We performed a systematic review to evaluate the relationship between pseudarthrosis after ACDF and the interbody graft used. Results A total of 3732 patients were evaluated in 46 studies. The mean age of the included patients was 51.5 ± 4.18 years (range, 42–59.6 years). ACDF is most often perforemd as single-level surgery and the level most impaired is C5-C6. The use of titanium cages, zero profile, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2, and carbon cages was seen as a protective factor for pseudarthrosis compared with the autograft group (control group); with an odds ratio of 0.29, 0.51, 0.03, and 0.3, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. The use of polyetheretherketone, poly(methyl methacrylate), and trabecular metal was a risk factor for development of pseudarthrosis compared with the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.7, 8.7, and 6.8, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. Radiologic follow-up was an important factor for the pseudarthrosis rate; paradoxically, a short follow-up ( 2 years increased the chance of finding pseudarthrosis. Conclusions Different types of grafts lead to a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates. Follow-up time is also an important factor that affects the rate of pseudarthrosis after ACDF.

Keywords: control group; systematic review; group; pseudarthrosis; pseudarthrosis acdf

Journal Title: World neurosurgery
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.