OBJECTIVE To compare the accuracy of C-arm fluoroscopy versus O-arm assisted pedicle screw (PS) placement in the cervicothoracic spinal junction (CTSJ). METHODS Patients who underwent PS placement in the CTSJ… Click to show full abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the accuracy of C-arm fluoroscopy versus O-arm assisted pedicle screw (PS) placement in the cervicothoracic spinal junction (CTSJ). METHODS Patients who underwent PS placement in the CTSJ (C7-T4) at our hospital were included in this study. Of 37 patients who underwent PS placement in the CTSJ, 20 underwent intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy-assisted surgery (C-group) and 17 underwent intraoperative O-arm-assisted surgery (O-group). In total, 159 PSs were placed-73 in the C-group and 86 in the O-group. The accuracy of PS placement was compared between the C-group and the O-group using the classification proposed by Gertzbein and Robbins to analyze pedicle violation. RESULTS PS accuracy was higher in the O-group than in the C-group; PS placement evaluated as Grade A, representing no perforation, was 95.3% (82/86) for the O-group, whereas it was 78.1% (57/73) for the C-group. There was a clear statistically significant difference in accuracy of PS placement between the groups (P = 0.0013). CONCLUSION O-arm-assisted surgery improved the accuracy of PS placement in the CTSJ.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.