Abstract Robust identification of the most accurate observed input data among a pool of observations is key in modeling and decision making. A statistically biased observed measurement deteriorates the predictive… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Robust identification of the most accurate observed input data among a pool of observations is key in modeling and decision making. A statistically biased observed measurement deteriorates the predictive power of a model and affects decision-making ability based on the prediction of the model. When two competing methods of measurement are available, such as methods which identify arrival times in acoustic emission (AE) signals, a principal question is whether one of the two obtained datasets, or a combination of the two, should be used later on, for example, to localize an AE source. This question becomes more important when collecting not repeatable data such as AE signals created by a propagating crack. This paper considers an inverse source location problem in a concrete block to address the mentioned issue, a proposed methodology which also has wider application in competitive data selection. Elastic energy released by an AE event, such as a propagating crack, is recorded by acoustic emission data acquisition system. The onset time of AE signals is often used to locate the source of the event, and its accuracy directly affects the precision of source identification. This research proposes an innovative approach to select the most probable onset time obtained from two automatic picker methods. The proposed method selects the most probable onset times, which are observed by each picker for each sensor, in a probabilistic fashion. To validate the proposed method, the most accurate onset time observed by each picker is identified by visual inspection and is compared with the one is selected by the proposed method. Finally, the dataset is used for source location identification. Results show that picked onset times determined by the proposed method generate more accurate source identification when compared with coordinates obtained using each dataset individually.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.