LAUSR

Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are highly prone to complications and adverse effects. Their treatment has long been a matter of controversy, as fracture patterns and possible damage to soft tissues can easily aggravate complications. On the one hand, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques provide a good approach to joint shape restoration and biomechanics, but they may also provoke a higher rate of soft-tissue complications. On the other, hybrid external fixation (HEF), although allowing little facility for reduction, may, theoretically, produce much less damage to the soft tissues. We present 93 cases of TPF classified as type V or VI that were followed up for at least 24 months. There were no statistical differences among them in relation to consolidation, secondary malalignment or range of motion, according to whether ORIF or HEF was employed. However, when external fixation followed open reduction, both superficial and deep-infection rates were higher.