LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Interpretation of results of pooled analysis of individual patient data – Authors' reply

Photo from wikipedia

We thank Nick Freemantle and Domenico Pagano, and Peter Juni and colleagues for their comments on our Article on mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention… Click to show full abstract

We thank Nick Freemantle and Domenico Pagano, and Peter Juni and colleagues for their comments on our Article on mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in which we identified important subgroup differences that might affect the choice of revascularisation modality. Freemantle and Pagano challenge our conclusions because we performed no tests for interaction between left main and multivessel disease and did not correct for multiplicity. However, a subgroup analysis according to left main versus multivessel disease would be unsound; many patients in the subgroup with left main disease also had multivessel disease and therefore groups were not mutually exclusive. Hence, testing for a subgroup effect might risk falsely rejecting the null hypothesis. [...]

Keywords: left main; interpretation results; disease; results pooled; pooled analysis; multivessel disease

Journal Title: The Lancet
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.