LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? By Shai Dothan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. vii, 161. Index.

Photo by giamboscaro from unsplash

tion, one needs not only to be able to read and figure out the extent to which one can accommodate the interest of other states but one needs also to… Click to show full abstract

tion, one needs not only to be able to read and figure out the extent to which one can accommodate the interest of other states but one needs also to be able to read the personalities of the other participants and understand what levers and methods will be effective in influencing them. In any event, it is clear that if one wants to gather sufficient votes for plenary adoption of legal texts, it is necessary to negotiate an outcome that a large majority of the delegations can support. Negotiating Civil War provides useful background on the development of legal regimes regulating civil wars, both historically and in the three case studies. Lovat makes insightful observations about the roles of various players in the negotiations. His main objective, to develop hypotheses that explain the negotiation of civil war regimes, will be of more interest to international relations theorists than to international law practitioners, particularly lawyers who negotiate multilateral agreements.

Keywords: judicial review; courts intervene; cambridge; review international; international courts; international judicial

Journal Title: American Journal of International Law
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.