LAUSR

Abstract Objective: Preparedness in different sections of a society can improve the reactions of individuals at the time of disasters and strengthen the cooperation and coordination between people and organizations. The present study aimed to investigate the preparedness of households in Ardabil Province of Iran in the face of disasters in 2020. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in Ardabil Province in Iran in 2020. The target population included the households living in Ardabil Province. The study was conducted on 10 502 participants. The data were collected using a questionnaire completed by trained questioners by referring to the participants’ houses. It should be noted that the questionnaires were completed by one of the household parents. The questionnaire contained 15 questions related to taking and not taking disaster preparedness measures at specific times. EXCEL 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and SPSS 23 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) were used for data analysis. Results: Considering the score of 1 for each action, the mean score of households’ disaster preparedness in Ardabil Province was 31.09%. The preparedness level of 51.4%, 42.31%, and 6.29% of the households in the province against disasters was at low, moderate, and good levels, respectively. Among the items of preparedness in the face of disasters, the highest value was related to the familiarity of family members with the initial warnings of significant hazards (5162 households, 49.15%) followed by planning for coping with disasters (43.12%) and assessing the non-structural vulnerability (38.93%). Furthermore, the results showed that the level of household preparedness was higher in the center of the province compared to other cities. Conclusion: Evaluating the level of preparedness of different societies in the face of disasters can be very useful in identifying the challenges to improve preparedness and, consequently, achieving sustainable development. This assessment can be considered a resource for provincial policy-making and planning to achieve the priorities set out in the Sendai framework. However, such assessments should be performed periodically, for example, annually, to reflect the effectiveness of the interventional measures in improving preparedness. Considering the low level of households’ preparedness in the present study, there is a gap between what people know and what they do, and comprehensive studies are needed on various factors that encourage people to take preparedness measures.