LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Home Rule: National Sovereignty and the Separation of Natives and Migrants Nandita Sharma, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020, pp. 384.

Photo by brina_blum from unsplash

In response the Wet'suwet'en, as well as long-standing and emergent allies, targeted critical infrastructure, grinding the flow of capital to a near halt, and adopted three key slogans: “Reconciliation Is… Click to show full abstract

In response the Wet'suwet'en, as well as long-standing and emergent allies, targeted critical infrastructure, grinding the flow of capital to a near halt, and adopted three key slogans: “Reconciliation Is Dead,” “Shutdown Canada” and “Land Back ” Extending work begun in her first book, Home Economics (2006), Sharma accounts for how the violence—direct and structural—targeting those whom state authorities label as “Migrants” is not incidental to the global state system but, rather, essential to reproducing its governing logics [ ]Sharma's commitment to a macro-historical lens—while not without merit—forces her attention solely on hegemonic political formations

Keywords: rule national; home; sovereignty separation; home rule; separation natives; national sovereignty

Journal Title: Canadian Journal of Political Science
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.