LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Studying Arctic Fields: Cultures, Practices, and Environmental Sciences. R.C. Powell. 2017. Ontario: McGill-Queens University Press. 264 p, hardcover. ISBN 9780773551121. CAD 120

Photo from wikipedia

Notwithstanding, Hossain rightfully argues that governance shortcomings are manifold and range from procedural failures, such as inadequate implementation; via lack of inclusion of established environmental principles; to the lack of… Click to show full abstract

Notwithstanding, Hossain rightfully argues that governance shortcomings are manifold and range from procedural failures, such as inadequate implementation; via lack of inclusion of established environmental principles; to the lack of inclusion of indigenous and local peoples in the Arctic. While this may be the case, Hossain concludes that in light of the cooperative efforts under the Arctic Council it is possible to maintain a ‘piecemeal’ approach to resource governance without the need for a new comprehensive regime if the Council were to establish means to coordinate the different regimes and “help to identify the overlapping aspects so that better implementation of cross-sectoral resource management can be achieved” (p. 297). When presenting the four areas of the high seas where marine protected areas can be found, the chapter erroneously remarks that the “Northern Ocean” (p. 288) holds such an MPA. Of course, a Northern Ocean does not exist and what the author means to say is that in the Southern Ocean MPAs can be found. The second ‘polar’ chapter is entitled “Climate change and the shifting international law and policy seascape for Arctic shipping” by David VanderZwaag. In this short and rather descriptive chapter the author presents the various governance initiatives taken regionally, globally and bilaterally to meet the challenges of changing environmental and economic conditions pertaining to shipping in the Arctic. At the core of the chapter stand the initiatives taken by the Arctic Council and in particular its Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment, and the briefly introduced work of the Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission. The second focus lies on the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the difficulties surrounding the adoption of the Polar Code. This International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters was adopted in 2014 and entered into force on 1 January 2017. Although the entering into force of the Polar Code marks a milestone for polar shipping, it does not address other pressing challenges, such as the regulation of grey water – sink, shower and laundry – discharged by vessels, or the ongoing agreement to disagree on the status of the Northwest Passage between the United States and Canada. Unfortunately the author does not delve into potential future prospects or provide further food for thought for resolving these challenges, the presentation of which is the main trajectory of this chapter. Also in this chapter an editorial mistake occurred: indigenous organisations are not “Permanent Observers” (p. 302) but Permanent Participants in the Arctic Council. The third ‘polar’ chapter, by Elizabeth Burleson and Jennifer Huang, shifts to the Antarctic and concerns ‘Governance of climate change impacts on the Antarctic marine environment.’ Again, large parts of the chapter are descriptive in nature and outline the prevailing governance regime in the Antarctic. But the authors provide critical food for thought and do not shy away from giving recommendations and suggestions for equipping the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) with tools to weather the ongoing and impending environmental and economic changes in Antarctica. Most intriguingly, the authors compare the governance regimes of the Arctic, in this context the Arctic Council, and the ATS and present their views on what both regimes could learn from each other. For instance, they propose that the eight Arctic states and the fifty parties to the Antarctic Treaty could form polar coalitions in order to advance the polar agenda under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In light of the increase in Antarctic tourism, the authors recognise the potential of the Polar Code as a means for integrated polar governance. Indeed, this reviewer can only concur with the idea of approaching the polar regions comprehensively despite their obvious social, political and demographic differences. After all, as the authors underline, both polar regions play a crucial role in the Earth’s climate system and should be taken centre stage in the global climate and ocean regimes. While there are repetitions and overlaps in the volumes, and some rather minor editorial oversights, this reviewer was firmly impressed by the comprehensiveness of the presented topics and the diverse picture that is presented in this book. Climate change impacts on ocean and coastal law illustrates impressively how the complex environmental changes caused by climate change impact the different legal systems pertaining to the coasts and the sea in multifaceted ways. The book is therefore not only recommendable for legal scholars but also, given its background-providing nature, for scholars in other disciplines. Most notably, those doing research on, or working with, the challenges of climate change are strongly encouraged to obtain a copy of this book. (Nikolas Sellheim, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge. Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK ([email protected])).

Keywords: governance; chapter; climate change; council

Journal Title: Polar Record
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.