LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reply to: Letter to the Editor: Sodium nitroprusside for schizophrenia: could methodological variables account for the different results obtained?

Photo by sxy_selia from unsplash

We thank Maia-de-Oliveira et al. (2016) for their thoughtful comments on our recent paper (Stone et al. 2016). There were indeed differences in the population of patients studied in our… Click to show full abstract

We thank Maia-de-Oliveira et al. (2016) for their thoughtful comments on our recent paper (Stone et al. 2016). There were indeed differences in the population of patients studied in our study and in their original investigation (Hallak et al. 2013). We noted in our paper that the sample studied by Hallak et al. (2013) was younger and had a shorter duration of illness than the patients in our study. We recognize that the response to pharmacological treatment in schizophrenia may vary with stage of illness, and we are currently running a study of a nitric oxide donor compound in patients with first-episode psychosis to investigate this possibility. Given the high prevalence of tobacco use in patients with schizophrenia (Hartz et al. 2014), the suggestion that smoking may influence the efficacy of sodium nitroprusside is interesting, and merits further study, as does the possibility that the response may vary across different ethnic groups.

Keywords: schizophrenia; editor sodium; reply letter; sodium nitroprusside; letter editor

Journal Title: Psychological Medicine
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.