LAUSR

In a wide-ranging yet refreshingly particularistic study, Brett explores how exegesis of the Hebrew scriptures can contribute to postcolonial Christian theologies and practices of reconciliation in formerly colonial settler nations such as Australia, New Zealand, the USA and Canada. His goal is to show that because theology is inseparable from politics, it can be advanced in secular societies through public discourse, and specifically through ‘a thickening of dialogue between religious and non-religious traditions’ (p. 35), including First Nations traditions. The book comprises three sections, of which the first seeks to establish the ethics of conversation in colonial settler societies, with a particular view to the church’s involvement. He begins with a critique of Jürgen Habermas’ notion of civic universality as the basis of ideal political community. Over against that conception, which favours general and abstract legal norms of justice, Brett finds greater promise for restorative justice in ecclesial forms of sociality, actual practices of building relationships that reflect the postcolonial church’s ‘thoroughly political’ commitments (p. 32). He envisions more ‘generous’ societies, deliberately polycentric and polyphonic in their structure and interactions, where weaker groups share power and engage politically with stronger groups in ‘kenotic communion’ (p. 33). In the second section, Brett turns to biblical exegesis, treating portions of the Priestly Tradition in Torah, the later chapters of Isaiah (40–66) and Job. One of the strengths of this study is that Brett sets aside the reductionistic and imprecise notion of an overarching metanarrative in the Bible, focusing instead on these several tradition complexes, with their internal conversations and interactions with other parts of scripture. He reconceives these complexes as distinctive social imaginaries, socially embodied and historically extended conversations that help communities to identify the common good. He reads them as paradigmatic minority voices in Israel’s lengthy post-national period, new imaginaries that emerge in the wake of trauma. (That posited historical situation is of course most certain for Isaiah; Brett does not discuss the complicated debate about dating the Priestly Tradition, with its multiple compositional layers.) His focus is on how each complex develops a vision for Israel’s religious life in the absence of political sovereignty, and particularly for relations with non-Israelites or other marginalised persons. In contrast to Deuteronomy and Ezra-Nehemiah, Brett argues, the imaginary represented in these three minority traditions ‘pointed more towards the possibilities for reconciliation than towards confrontational postures or