Photo from wikipedia
Abstract Here, we argue that attackers in intergroup conflicts are also likely to hold strong identity fusion, anticipate threat from the out-groups, and retaliate by signaling preemptive aggressiveness, which may… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Here, we argue that attackers in intergroup conflicts are also likely to hold strong identity fusion, anticipate threat from the out-groups, and retaliate by signaling preemptive aggressiveness, which may not be asymmetrically exclusive to defenders. We propose that the study of the intergroup and intragroup dynamics could highlight more specific, robust markers to differentiate types of defenders from attackers.
Keywords:
types attackers;
attackers defenders;
need discriminate;
intergroup conflicts;
toward need;
discriminate types
Journal Title: Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Year Published: 2019
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Year Published: 2019
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!