Photo from wikipedia
Abstract We challenge Johnson et al.'s assumption that people reduce unclear situations to a single narrative explanation and that such reduction would be adaptive for decision-making under radical uncertainty. Instead,… Click to show full abstract
Abstract We challenge Johnson et al.'s assumption that people reduce unclear situations to a single narrative explanation and that such reduction would be adaptive for decision-making under radical uncertainty. Instead, we argue that people imagine and maintain multiple narrative possibilities throughout the decision-making process and that this process provides cognitive flexibility and adaptive benefits within the proposed model.
Keywords:
high stakes;
narrative conviction;
flexibility;
require narrative;
stakes decisions;
decisions require
Journal Title: Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Year Published: 2023
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Year Published: 2023
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!