In recent years, copper(I/II) complexes have emerged as alternative redox shuttles in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), exhibiting more positive redox potential than iodine- and cobalt-based redox shuttles. In particular, copper(I/II)… Click to show full abstract
In recent years, copper(I/II) complexes have emerged as alternative redox shuttles in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), exhibiting more positive redox potential than iodine- and cobalt-based redox shuttles. In particular, copper(I/II) complexes with 1,10-phenanthroline- or 2,2'-bipyridyl-based ligands attained moderate to high power conversion efficiencies (6-11%) with a high open-circuit voltage (VOC) over 1.0 V due to the positive potentials. Although copper(I/II) complexes with 1,10-phenanthroline-based ligands with 2,9-substituents have been developed, the effect of their ligand structures on the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs have not been fully addressed due to limited synthetic access to 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives. In this study, we designed and synthesized a series of copper(I/II) complexes with 1,10-phenanthroline ligands with different substituents at the 2,9-positions: bis(2-n-butyl-1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I/II) ([Cu(bp)2]1+/2+), bis(2-ethyl-9-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I/II) ([Cu(emp)2]1+/2+), bis(2,9-diethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I/II) ([Cu(dep)2]1+/2+), and bis(2,9-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I/II) ([Cu(dpp)2]1+/2+). The more positive redox potentials of [Cu(emp)2]1+/2+ and [Cu(dep)2]1+/2+, compared to that of bis(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I/II) ([Cu(dmp)2]1+/2+), originate from the larger steric hindrance of the ethyl group instead of the methyl group, whereas the redox potential of [Cu(bp)2]1+/2+ is significantly shifted to the negative direction because of the lower steric hindrance of the 2-monosubstituted 1,10-phenanthroline ligands. The efficiency of the DSSC with [Cu(bp)2]1+/2+ (5.90%) is almost comparable to the DSSC with [Cu(dmp)2]1+/2+ (6.29%). In contrast, the DSSCs with [Cu(emp)2]1+/2+ (3.25%), [Cu(dep)2]1+/2+ (2.56%), and [Cu(dpp)2]1+/2+ (2.21%) exhibited lower efficiencies than those with [Cu(dmp)2]1+/2+ and [Cu(bp)2]1+/2+. The difference can be rationalized by the electron collection efficiencies. Considering the similar photovoltaic properties of the DSSCs with [Cu(bp)2]1+/2+ and [Cu(dmp)2]1+/2+, the use of copper(I/II) complexes with 2-monosubstituted 1,10-phenanthroline ligands as the redox shuttle may be useful to improve the short-circuit current density while retaining the rather high VOC value when dyes with a smaller bandgap (i.e., better light harvesting) are developed.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.