The prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is presystemically hydrolyzed into the pharmacologically active compound mycophenolic acid (MPA), has been widely used for the prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection in solid… Click to show full abstract
The prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is presystemically hydrolyzed into the pharmacologically active compound mycophenolic acid (MPA), has been widely used for the prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. However, the huge variability in the plasma concentration level makes the development of MMF drug products difficult due to the great challenge of meeting the traditional bioequivalence (BE) limits. Numerous models have been developed in the past decade to explain the variability, with the emphasis on characterizing the enterohepatic circulation. While the variability arising from systemic appearance can also contribute to the remarkable MPA variability to a great extent, it has been ignored for long for this Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 2 drug. To improve the design of the BE study for this highly variable (HV) drug, the variability of MMF pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles focusing on the absorption process was explored in a population approach. A total of 81 Chinese adult liver transplant recipients were enrolled and had their plasma concentrations of MPA and its metabolites measured by HPLC during one visit or multiple visits in a long-term MMF regimen. The population models were developed using NONMEM, and the data and the results of the model were analyzed by R. Two population PK models of MMF focusing on the absorption process were developed based on the plasma concentrations of MPA and its major metabolite 7-O-MPA-β-glucuronide (MPAG). The MPA PK profiles were best characterized by a two-compartment disposition model with zero inter-individual variability (IIV) of elimination coefficient (K20), lag time, but considerable intra-individual variability (IAV) in the form of inter-occasion variability regarding systemic appearance coefficient, K20, and central volume of distribution, when just using MPA plasma concentrations as observations. The second model took into consideration the EHC by including MPAG profiles as well. The results from both models showcased that the IAV played a far more significant role than the IIV in accounting for the variability of the MMF systemic appearance. This is in line with what was found in the BE study: the within-subject variability (WSV) of BE measures largely exceeded the corresponding between-subject variability. The great WSV of MMF can be mechanistically explained by the interplay of dissolution and solubility with the gastrointestinal (GI) physiological dynamics, especially the gastric emptying (GE) in the fasting state regulated by migrating motor complex, and GE and pH variations in the fed state by the caloric content with irregular patterns of GI motility and secretion. The results implied that for the immediate-release solid oral dosage forms of MMF, running a regular in vitro dissolution test for the fasting state and developing a predictive in vitro dissolution test with sufficient simulation of the GE dynamics and proximal small intestinal pH fluctuations for the fed state would be excellent surrogates for the in vivo BE test. Furthermore, a physiologically based predictive in vitro dissolution test under both fasting and fed conditions would be a new trend for the BE studies of all other HV drug products.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.