LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comment on “Comparing Paleomagnetic Study Means With Apparent Wander Paths: A Case Study and Paleomagnetic Test of the Greater India Versus Greater Indian Basin Hypotheses” by David B. Rowley

Photo from wikipedia

The northernmost rocks in the India‐Asia collision zone that were off‐scraped from continental crust of the Indian plate are the nappes of the so‐called Tibetan Himalaya, and the paleogeographic area… Click to show full abstract

The northernmost rocks in the India‐Asia collision zone that were off‐scraped from continental crust of the Indian plate are the nappes of the so‐called Tibetan Himalaya, and the paleogeographic area between the Tibetan Himalaya and modern undeformed India is known as “Greater India.” Paleomagnetic data have long been used to infer that the paleolatitudinal distance between the Tibetan Himalaya and India, defining the width of Greater India, was in Early Cretaceous, Triassic, and Ordovician time not more than some hundreds of kilometers wider than today (e.g., Bian et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2015; Klootwijk & Bingham, 1980; Qin et al., 2019; Torsvik et al., 2009; van Hinsbergen et al., 2012, 2019; Figure 1). This is consistent with (i) shortening records of the Himalaya that show that some 500–600 km (perhaps up to 900 km) of upper continental crust was stacked (in two episodes: in the latest Paleocene‐earliest Eocene (~55 Ma), and since the latest Oligocene (~30–25 Ma) with no demonstrated record of nappe accretion in the intervening period (Long et al., 2011); (ii) with tectonic reconstructions of the west Australian margin that argue that during the Early Cretaceous breakup of east Gondwana, continental India did not extend beyond a prominent fracture zone (the Wallaby fracture zone) limiting its width to ~800 km (Ali & Aitchison, 2005; Gibbons et al., 2012); and (iii) with seismic tomographic constraints that the modern Indian continent that is imaged below Tibet today is of similar shape and area as predicted by a Gondwana fit of Greater India against the Wallaby fracture zone (van Hinsbergen et al., 2019).

Keywords: fracture zone; comment comparing; study; tibetan himalaya; greater india; india

Journal Title: Tectonics
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.