LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

How do real animals account for the passage of time during associative learning?

Photo by jontyson from unsplash

Animals routinely learn to associate environmental stimuli and self-generated actions with their outcomes such as rewards. One of the most popular theoretical models of such learning is the reinforcement learning… Click to show full abstract

Animals routinely learn to associate environmental stimuli and self-generated actions with their outcomes such as rewards. One of the most popular theoretical models of such learning is the reinforcement learning (RL) framework. The simplest form of RL, model-free RL, is widely applied to explain animal behavior in numerous neuroscientific studies. More complex RL versions assume that animals build and store an explicit model of the world in memory. To apply these approaches to explain animal behavior, typical neuroscientific RL models make implicit assumptions about how real animals represent the passage of time. In this perspective, I explicitly list these assumptions and show that they have several problematic implications. I hope that the explicit discussion of these problems encourages the field to seriously examine the assumptions underlying timing and reinforcement learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Keywords: real animals; passage time; time associative; account passage; animals account

Journal Title: Behavioral neuroscience
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.