LAUSR

Research on emotional modulation of attention in gaze cueing has resulted in contradictory findings. Some studies found larger gaze cueing effects (GCEs) in response to a fearful gaze cue, whereas others did not. A recent study explained this discrepancy within a cognitive resource account, in which perceptual demands of the task promote a bias toward either a local (discrimination task) or global (localization task) processing strategy. During local processing, the integration of emotional expression with gaze direction is assumed to be impaired, whereas during global processing integration is assumed to be facilitated. In the current study, we investigated the cognitive resource account in three experiments. In Experiment 1, we manipulated task demands by adopting a detection or a localization task whilst both should allow global processing. In Experiments 2 and 3, we induced either a local or global perceptual processing strategy by presenting local or global targets (Experiment 2) or by priming local or global perception prior to the gaze cueing task (Experiment 3). Results showed faster orienting in response to a fearful face cue independent of task demands in Experiment 1. Inducing local and global processing strategies in Experiments 2 and 3 did not affect emotional modulation of the GCE. In contrast, Bayesian analyses provided evidence of absence of such an effect, demonstrating that local or global processing strategies cannot explain the mixed findings obtained in emotional modulation of gaze cueing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).