LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Metacognition reflects our capacity to monitor or evaluate other cognitive states as they unfold during task performance, for example, our level of confidence in the veracity of a memory. Impaired metacognition is seen in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and substantially impacts their ability to manage functional difficulties during recovery. Recent evidence suggests that metacognitive representations reflect domain-specific processes (e.g., memory vs. perception) acting jointly with generic confidence signals mediated by widespread frontoparietal networks. The impact of neurological insult on metacognitive processes across different cognitive domains following TBI remains unknown. METHOD To assess metacognitive accuracy, we measured decision confidence across both a perceptual and memory task in patients with TBI (n = 27) and controls (n = 28). During the metacognitive tasks, continuous electroencephalography was recorded, and event-related potentials (ERP) were analyzed. RESULTS First, we observed a deficit in metacognitive efficiency across both tasks suggesting that patients show a loss of perceptual and memorial evidence available for confidence judgments despite equivalent accuracy levels to controls. Second, a late positive-going ERP waveform (500-700 ms) was greater in amplitude for high versus low-confidence judgements for controls across both task domains. By contrast, in patients with TBI, the same ERP waveform did not vary by confidence level suggesting a deficient or attenuated neural marker of decision confidence postinjury. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that diffuse damage to putative frontoparietal regions in patients disrupts domain-general metacognitive accuracy and electrophysiological signals that accumulate evidence of decision confidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).