LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Changing multicultural guidelines: Clinical and research implications for evidence-based psychotherapies.

Photo from wikipedia

The American Psychological Association's (APA) release of the multicultural guidelines (APA Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity and intersectionality, 2017, http://www apa org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines pdf;APA guidelines on race and… Click to show full abstract

The American Psychological Association's (APA) release of the multicultural guidelines (APA Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity and intersectionality, 2017, http://www apa org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines pdf;APA guidelines on race and ethnicity in psychology: Promoting responsiveness and equity, 2019, http://www apa org/about/policy/race-and-ethnicity-in-psychology pdf) is a welcome advance to the conceptualization and practice of culture in psychology These guidelines mark a significant expansion of the previous Multicultural Guidelines (APA Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice and organizational change for psychologists, 2002) It is argued that changes in these guidelines are substantial enough to constitute a paradigmatic shift with significant implications and challenges for the development of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) Furthermore, these guidelines are particularly timely and applicable to cope with the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, social/racial unrest, and in promoting international collaborations However, in the process of broadening cultural approaches, confusion is created in already contested, imperfect, and evolving cultural concepts The goal of this article is to clarify and examine this emerging paradigm that is herein called cultural EBPs and is differentiated from its two predecessors, universal EBPs and racial and ethnic minority EBPs Each paradigm is distinguished by describing APA multicultural guidelines and contrasting two dimensions extended from the treatment match model that underlies EBPs These two dimensions are (a) main cultural assumptions and (b) methods and evidence (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement This article suggests that the APA release of the multicultural guidelines (APA Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity and intersectionality, 2017, http://www apa org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines pdf;APA guidelines on race and ethnicity in psychology: Promoting responsiveness and equity, 2019, http://www apa org/about/policy/race-and-ethnicity-in-psychology pdf) is a welcome advance to the conceptualization and practice of culture with significant implications and challenges for the development of EBPs This article clarifies and examines these implications as it suggests that these changes are indicative of an emerging paradigm herein called cultural EBPs that are differentiated from previous understandings (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Keywords: research; http www; multicultural guidelines; evidence; www apa; psychology

Journal Title: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.