LAUSR

The quality and impact of psychotherapy sessions are primary concerns in service delivery. However, no published investigations of quality or impact of psychotherapy sessions with American Indian (AI) patients could be found in the scientific literature. We sought to demonstrate that collecting such data is feasible as well as to inform the development of evidence-based practices and cultural adaptations. To this end, we asked psychotherapists treating AIs in outpatient psychotherapy within an urban community clinic to rate the quality and impact of sessions delivered to their clients. Eight psychotherapists self-reported session quality and impact with the Session Evaluation Questionnaire, Form 5 (SEQ-5; Stiles, 1980, 1984) immediately following service delivery to 112 separate, consecutive clients. Session quality was assessed with measures of depth and smoothness. Post-session impact was assessed with measures of positivity and emotional arousal. Overall, sessions were rated as equally deep, but smoother, more positive, and less emotionally arousing in comparison to a sample of experienced university-based psychotherapists (Cummings et al., 1993). However, sessions provided by AI psychotherapists were rated as deeper, less positive, and more emotionally arousing than sessions provided by White psychotherapists. Replicating this study in a larger sample and including client as well as observer ratings will help to move this nascent line of research forward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).