PurposeWe sought to determine the analytical sensitivity of several extended exome variation analysis approaches in terms of their contribution to diagnostic yield and their clinical feasibility.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the results… Click to show full abstract
PurposeWe sought to determine the analytical sensitivity of several extended exome variation analysis approaches in terms of their contribution to diagnostic yield and their clinical feasibility.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the results of genetic testing in 1,059 distinct cases referred for exome sequencing to our institution. In these, we routinely employed extended exome analysis approaches in addition to basic variant analysis, including (i) copy-number variation (CNV) detection, (ii) nonconsensus splice defect detection, (ii) genomic breakpoint detection, (iv) homozygosity mapping, and (v) mitochondrial variant analysis.ResultsExtended exome analysis approaches assisted in identification of causative genetic variant in 44 cases, which represented a 4.2% increase in diagnostic yield. The greatest contribution was associated with CNV analysis (1.8%) and splice variant prediction (1.2%), and the remaining approaches contributed an additional 1.2%. Analysis of workload has shown that on average nine additional variants per case had to be interpreted in the extended analysis.ConclusionWe show that extended exome analysis approaches improve the diagnostic yield of heterogeneous genetic disorders and result in considerable increase of diagnostic yield of exome sequencing with a minor increase of interpretative workload.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.