LAUSR

Objectives To assess the appropriateness of oral surgery referrals, after triage, to intermediate minor oral surgery (IMOS) practices in East Kent and whether or not referrals vary according to the referring general dental practitioner's (GDP's) place of qualification and experience. Design A retrospective study of the records of 441 triaged referrals sent to three IMOS practices in East Kent, over a ten-week period. An assessment tool was developed in line with local and national referral guidelines. Information on all referrals was obtained from the IMOS provider and referral records. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Results The most common reason for referral was for extraction of teeth requiring bone removal (n = 155; 35%). However, the majority of teeth removed were recorded as a non-surgical extraction (n = 363; 82%). Medical histories were included appropriately in the referral communications, with only 0.2% of all referrals being inappropriate. The proportion of appropriate and inappropriate referrals was very similar and it was found that referral rate was lower from dentists who had been qualified for more than ten years. GDPs working in the same location as the IMOS provider made a greater total number of referrals as well as more inappropriate referrals. Conclusions In the group of GDPs and IMOS providers studied, a wide variation was observed between the GDP's reason for referral and the treatment provided. It may be concluded that the vast majority of extractions were safely completed in an IMOS dental practice in a primary care setting.