Photo from academic.microsoft.com
Technology for the treatment of stone disease has rapidly advanced, but a common nomenclature to communicate research and high-quality studies to assess treatment outcomes are lacking. Thus, guidelines are based… Click to show full abstract
Technology for the treatment of stone disease has rapidly advanced, but a common nomenclature to communicate research and high-quality studies to assess treatment outcomes are lacking. Thus, guidelines are based on low-grade evidence and cannot make definitive recommendations in many scenarios. To improve clinical practice and patient outcomes, the endourology community must unite to address these inadequacies.
Keywords:
lack consensus;
stone;
consensus among;
researchers influences;
among stone;
stone researchers
Journal Title: Nature Reviews Urology
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Nature Reviews Urology
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!