LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reply to the 'Comment on "Bilayer aggregate microstructure determines viscoelasticity of lung surfactant suspensions"' by J.-F. Berret, DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00653g.

Photo by nhiamoua from unsplash

In their comment, Berret suggests that Curosurf, one of three clinical lung surfactant aqueous suspensions examined in the Soft Matter, 2021, 17, 5170-51820 is a Newtonian liquid rather than a… Click to show full abstract

In their comment, Berret suggests that Curosurf, one of three clinical lung surfactant aqueous suspensions examined in the Soft Matter, 2021, 17, 5170-51820 is a Newtonian liquid rather than a shear-thinning soft solid with a small, but measurable yield stress. We postulate that these discrepancies may be due to the size of the magnetic wire measurement probe used in their paper (Thai et al., Colloids Surf., B, 2019, 178, 337-345) the diameter of which is similar in size to the Curosurf bilayer agregates (1-10 μm). The cone and plate rheometer used by Ciutara and Zasadzinski measures averaged effects over the entire macroscopic sample. Our combined results point out that the local viscoelastic properties of a moderately dense suspension may be different than its bulk properties.

Keywords: comment bilayer; lung surfactant; reply comment; comment

Journal Title: Soft matter
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.