LAUSR

Purpose This study aims to investigate the experiences and opinions of clinical educators from various allied health care fields, including audiology, related to the use of simulation as a teaching technique and determine the status of clinical simulation techniques in training audiology graduate students nationwide. Method An interview was conducted with nine faculty members in the College of Health Professions at Towson University to discuss advantages and challenges of incorporating clinical simulation techniques into student learning. A thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview responses. Additionally, a web-based questionnaire was sent to all audiology graduate program directors nationwide, yielding a response rate of 63%. These data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Interview responses revealed a number of benefits and barriers related to simulation use at the graduate level. Benefits included its use as a learning tool, a quality control measure, and an aid in professional development. It also increases students' confidence levels in clinical procedures and counseling skills and exposes them to a variety of clinical pathologies not routinely seen. Barriers included lack of training with simulators, lack of funding to purchase simulator technology, and lack of resources, such as time and space. At present, only 50% of audiology program directors reported using clinical simulation to train their students. Conclusions The field of audiology is embracing simulation techniques in training its preprofessional work force. To date, there has been limited guidance from professional organizations regarding the role of simulation in audiology. Additional assistance focusing on best practices for these techniques is warranted.